24/01/2018
Today, at Sorbonne Law, we talked about :
THE DOUBLE-SIDED NATURE OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Our speaker was Adrienne Stone, Redmond Barry Distinguished Professor, Kathleen Fitzpatrick Australian Laureate Fellow, Director of the Centre for Comparative Constitutional Studies, Melbourne Law School.
Comparative study of freedom of expression provides a rich case study of the propensity of rights to generate reasonable disagreement between three traditions/values/moral ideas in modern democracies : a liberty tradition (the United States); an equality tradition ( Canada) and a dignity tradition (Germany). Adrienne Stone argued that this ‘double-sided’ nature of freedom of speech lies, among other things, in understanding the ‘negative dimension’ of freedom of expression: that is, freedom of expression expresses and reflects attitudes toward state power. Those attitudes in turn reflect a complex combination of considerations of value, predictions of government behaviour and constructions of a constitutional culture.
Visiting Melbourne Law Prof Andrew Kenyon (right side of the panel) gave some interesting comments and Sorbonne law Prof Pierre Brunet (left side) finally warmly thanked them both on behalf of a full floor of students and colleagues.