14/03/2022
Currently on Netfilx, THE ADAM PROJECT raises some interesting issues. Yes, there is a lot of faff about time travel and some impressive CGI fight sequences that recall TRON and STAR WARS, among others. But in this film we have a very traditional narrative: a family loses a father and the project of life then comes to be restored, in the end, by raising up and reasserting the power of the father. (Lacanians would call such things the ‘paternal signifier’ or ‘Name-of-the-father’; perhaps Julia Kristeva would call this ‘the father of individual prehistory’ - time travel indeed!). All of this is very interesting in an age when the role of the father and his symbolic power is increasingly under pressure. In THE ADAM PROJECT, the evil villain is a woman, while the story’s wife-mother struggles to function now that she has lost her husband. Do I dare declare that the film’s message is that ‘women have messed things up’ and the only way to restore harmony to the world is to restore the power of the paternal signifier; that is, to restore patriarchal power? Well, I’d have difficulty seeing the film in any other way, right down to its assertion of the project of Adam over … well, over Eve, of course! Does this make THE ADAM PROJECT a bad film? Not necessarily. I think it makes it a very interesting interjection into debates on the the future of the nuclear family, the roles of motherhood and fatherhood, and childhood (the shadow of E.T. looms large here …).
Especially interesting, perhaps, in comparison to Almodóvar’s PARALLEL MOTHERS (which we wrote about a few weeks ago).