22/02/2026
On Freedom of Speech in MENA Cyberspace
This book examines the "cyber-security dilemma" facing nations in the Information Society, particularly the tension between protecting cybersecurity and preserving human rights such as Freedom of Expression.
Key Points:
The Core Dilemma: While the 2003 Geneva Declaration envisioned an inclusive Information Society, the digital age has created security challenges that undermine peace and stability. States must balance granting citizens Internet freedom against implementing security interventions that risk violating rights and international ethics.
Public Order Challenges:
The erosion of physical boundaries in cyberspace has intensified security threats, enabling individuals to pose global threats through digital devices in an instant. This is especially challenging for developing countries with inadequate legal frameworks.
State vs Individual Rights:
The text explores the tension between Social Atomism (individual rights) and Social Ontological Collectivism (community rights), reflected in different democratic approaches—Liberal Democratic (prioritising constitutional rights) versus Progressive Democratic (relying on local laws).
MENA Region Focus:
The study particularly examines cybersecurity and human rights issues in Middle East and North Africa countries, where complex cyber technologies compound violations. It includes field research in Morocco, Tunisia, Jordan, and Bahrain.
Historical Context:
The work traces Freedom of Speech from Greek Parrhesia through European coffee houses and Enlightenment thinkers to modern social media, showing how digital platforms have amplified both participation and problems like misinformation.
Findings and Recommendations:
Research reveals vulnerabilities, including legal unawareness, conflicting views on surveillance, and "crowdsourcing" that leads individuals to unintentionally violate their own rights. The text advocates balanced security measures based on standardised norms while cautioning against excessive "norms-whipping" that could infringe on freedoms.