06/02/2026
On April 29, the U.S. Supreme Court narrowed a section of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 meant to protect minorities’ political and voting power. In her dissent, Justice Elena Kagan called the court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais the “latest chapter in the majority's now-completed demolition of the Voting Rights Act.”
The decision struck down Louisiana's current congressional map, in which two of six districts were majority-Black, as an “unconstitutional racial gerrymander.” According to the last census, nearly one-third of Louisiana’s population is Black, but the ruling forces the state to revert to a map with only one majority-Black district.
For IPR economist and legal scholar Chika Okafor, the ruling raises a more fundamental question his research seeks to answer.
“Do colorblind rules actually produce fairness?” Okafor asked the audience during his IPR colloquium on May 11.
No, according to Okafor's research on social network discrimination—a concept he originated and demonstrated mathematically.
Read more: https://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/news/2026/louisiana-v-callais-a-lock-without-a-key.html