08/29/2022
For this week, we are highlighting a recent publication that our principal investigator and several researchers from other institutions collaborated to produce. These researchers identified a few challenges that face the next generation of clinical scientists, taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of present training practices.
They collected anonymous survey responses from nearly 600 clinical psychology Ph.D. students and faculty members at research-intensive programs and identified nine main challenges. Briefly, these challenges were labeled as follows:
1. An increasingly technical and multidisciplinary field → psychology has the opportunity to rely on a spectrum of technical tools that overlap amongst a variety of disciplines, yet the access to these tools is variable as well as the perceived utility of these tools; thus, the solution would be to increase access and clarity regarding the education of these resources
2. Dual training → psychology as a discipline needs to improve in the ways it integrates the clinical science and practice
3. Misalignment between training and jobs → sometimes the training that students receive is fixated on skills that are not necessarily applicable to the respective professions that they intend to conduct
4. Student financial strains → student financial debt is a major barrier and concern for highly qualified students to pursue these academic and professional paths and the solution is to increase student compensation from a variety of sources to open access
5. Systemic inequities and inadequate training → the workforce needs to diversify and target mental health inequities that arise from this lack of diversification as well as the unique struggles that marginalized populations will experience
6. Student health and wellbeing → institutions need to take proper accountability to promote student well-being through structural means
7. Heavy student and workload → part of this prior challenge of well-being means restructuring programs to allot reasonable timelines to ensure the quality of the care that these professionals are being trained to offer
8. Insufficient data for recursive refinement → it's difficult to return to prior practices and appropriately revise them for improvements because there are not enough data streams that have been collected for reflection; the simple solution to this is to develop evidence-based standards for training through the creation of new data streams
9. Systemic headwinds → faculty are some of the most valuable resources to pushing for these changes, yet they are frequently burdened by similar issues facing students; the solution to this is to craft student-faculty solidarity to achieve these goals as well as pushing institutions to create protected time for these groups to collaborate and improve the state of affairs
We strongly recommend reading the original publication (linked below), which goes far more in-depth with each of these points and recommendations!
Gee, D.G., DeYoung, K.M., McLaughlin, K.A., Tillman, R.M., Barch, D.M., Forbes, E.E., Krueger, R.F., Strauman, T.J., Weierich, M.R., Shackman, A.J. (2022). Training the Next Generation of Clinical Psychological Scientists: A Data-Driven Call to Action. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 18, 43-70.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086080/