University of Utah Department of Philosophy

University of Utah Department of Philosophy For current and former faculty, staff, and students of the University of Utah Philosophy Department,

Philosophy Colloquium Series presents Jonathan Herman from Georgia State UniversityFriday, November 15, 20192:30 - 4:30 ...
10/28/2019

Philosophy Colloquium Series presents Jonathan Herman from Georgia State University

Friday, November 15, 2019

2:30 - 4:30 in the Tanner Library

“Martin Buber, Daoism, and Cultural Appropriation”

One virtually unknown tidbit of modern intellectual history is that the existentialist philosopher and Jewish icon Martin Buber actually studied Chinese philosophy and literature throughout his career. At one end, more than a decade before he composed his best known work, I and Thou, Buber published a German translation of and commentary on the Daoist classic, the Zhuangzi. At the other end forty years later, he assembled ancient Chinese texts to support his unpopular advocacy of a collaborative Jewish-Arab state in Palestine. But the most significant of Buber’s Chinese studies is almost certainly the least well known: a series of lectures he delivered in Ascona, Switzerland on Laozi’s Daodejing in 1924, one short year after the publication of I and Thou. This talk explores Buber’s encounters with Daoism, focusing on the metaphysical, socio-ethical, and mystical dimensions of Buber’s interpretations.

Jonathan Herman is the Director of Undergraduate Studies and Associate Professor in the Department of Religious Studies at Georgia State University. He is the author of Taoism for Dummies (Wiley 2013), and several articles on Chinese religion, mysticism, and theory and method in the study of religion. He is currently working on a new book, From Dao to Dialogue: Martin Buber’s Encounter with Laozi.

Philosophy Colloquium Series presents Lanier Anderson from StanfordFriday, November 8th in the Tanner Library, CTIHB 459...
10/22/2019

Philosophy Colloquium Series presents Lanier Anderson from Stanford

Friday, November 8th in the Tanner Library, CTIHB 459
2:30 - 4:30 pm

“Nietzschean Autonomy and the Meaning of the ’Sovereign Individual’”

This paper has two goals—a narrow one which I take myself to achieve, and a more ambitious one toward which I can make only preliminary suggestions. The limited goal is to resolve an interpretive dispute over Nietzsche’s intentions in the Genealogy’s description of the “sovereign individual,” a character type whose features turn out to have important bearing on Nietzsche’s distinctive conceptions of conscience, promising, and what it is to take responsibility for oneself. The more ambitious goal is to characterize what Nietzsche means by autonomy and to assess what we might have to learn from his conception. The paper’s basic idea is that the meaning of the sovereign individual emerges clearly in the light of a distinction from Bernard Williams between two senses of responsibility—one sense tied to voluntary action, the other to an ambitious conception of responsible agency. What we learn about responsibility from Williams then illuminates how we should understand Nietzschean autonomy, and what philosophical purposes his conception can (and cannot) serve.

BYU's Ancient Near Eastern Studies program and the Richard L. Evans Chair of Religious Understanding are cosponsoring a ...
04/05/2019

BYU's Ancient Near Eastern Studies program and the Richard L. Evans Chair of Religious Understanding are cosponsoring a panel discussion next Wednesday, April 10, at 7:30 in 238 HRCB entitled “From Holy Envy to Holy Appreciation: Deepening Spirituality through Interfaith Engagement.”

I'll be joining Maeera Shreiber, Eric D. Huntsman, Ahmad Salah and Grant Underwood for the panel discussion.

Please come and feel free to share this announcement with others!
Image may contain: text

Philosophy Colloquium Series presents Kathryn Tabb from Columbia UniversityFriday, April 5, 20192:30 - 4:30Tanner Librar...
04/01/2019

Philosophy Colloquium Series presents Kathryn Tabb from Columbia University

Friday, April 5, 2019
2:30 - 4:30
Tanner Library, Room 459

Popular television shows, novels, and science writing about forensics and the law often rely on a widely-held intuition: that when behaviors are discovered to be caused by genetic dispositions, people consider them less blameworthy. And in real-life contexts like the courtroom, genetic information is increasingly brought to bear in order to mitigate punishments for antisocial or violent crimes. Yet, psychologists have not been able to produce this intuition in the laboratory setting as robustly as one might expect – indeed, there is very little empirical work showing any such effect at all, with most studies showing genetic information to have no significant effect on moral judgments. In this talk I present some empirical data suggesting why this might be the case. Results from recent studies show that people seem unwilling or unable to accept genetic explanations for antisocial behavior, while comparable explanations for prosocial behavior are accepted without equivalent resistance. In other words, before experimental subjects even get to the step of integrating genetic information about bad actions as part of their assessments of moral responsibility, they have already discounted its worth. My first aim is to consider what might cause this asymmetry, and what it might indicate about how common moral intuitions affect the way genetic information is received by non-specialists. My second aim is to consider some philosophical (and some practical) repercussions of these findings.

Daniel Molter"Biological Individuality in Fungi"PhD DefenseMarch 5 in SAEC 3151 at 9:00 am
03/04/2019

Daniel Molter

"Biological Individuality in Fungi"

PhD Defense

March 5 in SAEC 3151 at 9:00 am

Conference on PainFebruary 21- 22, 2019Tanner Library, CTIHB 459Agenda: https://philosophy.utah.edu/_documents/conferenc...
02/20/2019

Conference on Pain
February 21- 22, 2019
Tanner Library, CTIHB 459

Agenda:https://philosophy.utah.edu/_documents/conferences_workshops/2019/Pain%20Conference%20Agenda.pdf

Pain is ubiquitous in everyday life, but what is pain, and how should it be addressed ethically? This conference will bring philosophers, cognitive scientists, and pain specialists together to address these central philosophical questions about pain:

Does pain presuppose consciousness?

Is pain just physical sensation, or something more?

What is the relationship between pain and suffering?

Can one have pain and pleasure at the same time?

How might recent work on epistemic injustice illuminate our understanding of pain?

What is reliable evidence of pain?

Confirmed speakers include: Murat Aydede, Daniel Buchman, Matthew Fulkerson, Nada Gligorov, Caroline Huang, Amanda Pustilnik, Paisley Rekdal

The Department of Philosophy, Philosophy of Biology Lab Group, and Society, Water, & Climate Research Group are pleased ...
01/30/2019

The Department of Philosophy, Philosophy of Biology Lab Group, and Society, Water, & Climate Research Group are pleased to announce the following event:

Naomi Oreskes, "Scientific Consensus, Climate Change, and the Role of Uncertainty in Science"

Monday, Feb. 11, 4:30-5:30, Gardner Commons 1900

Oreskes is the co-author of "Merchants of Doubt," and Professor of History of Science at Harvard University. We hope you are able to join us!

Philosophy Colloquium Series presentsSUBRENA SMITHUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIREFriday, February 1, 20192:30 pm - 4:30 pmTa...
01/29/2019

Philosophy Colloquium Series presents

SUBRENA SMITH
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Friday, February 1, 2019

2:30 pm - 4:30 pm

Tanner Library, Room 459

"More Differences than Kinds"

It’s the norm in nature for organisms to exhibit traits that are uncommon amongst members of their kind. Deviations away from species-typical traits can be understood in different ways: near-term survival benefits or longer-term survival benefits. Human beings, like other living systems, exhibit traits that are different from some of the norms for some human beings. Against views that emphasize human similarity, this talk offers reasons for emphasizing difference.

Philosophy Colloquium Series presents Robert Pippin from the University of ChicagoThe Philosophy Department is pleased t...
11/30/2018

Philosophy Colloquium Series presents Robert Pippin from the University of Chicago

The Philosophy Department is pleased to announce that Robert Pippin, Evelyn Stefansson Nef Distinguished Service Professor of Philosophy, from the University of Chicago will speak on December 7. Talk title and abstract will be announced soon.

Campus Locations: Carolyn Tanner Irish Humanities Building (CTIHB)

Room Name/Number: Tanner Library, Room 459

Philosophy Colloquium Series Presents Marko Malink from NYU"Aristotle on Demonstration by reductio ad impossibileFriday,...
10/26/2018

Philosophy Colloquium Series Presents Marko Malink from NYU

"Aristotle on Demonstration by reductio ad impossibile

Friday, November 9, 2018

2:30 pm - 4:30 pm

Tanner Library, CTIHB, Room 459

Abstract: In the Posterior Analytics, Aristotle develops a theory of scientific knowledge and demonstration. He argues that direct demonstrations are superior to demonstrations by reductio ad impossibile on the grounds that the former, but not the latter, proceed from premises which are prior in nature to the conclusion (Posterior Analytics 1.26). While this view has been widely influential throughout the history of philosophy, Aristotle's argument for it is not straightforward and has been deemed problematic since antiquity. The purpose of this talk is to shed new light on this argument. I argue that it relies on a specific relation of priority in nature among scientific propositions that is determined by the theory of predication presented in Posterior Analytics 1.19-23. I show how this relation of priority in nature allows us to make sense of Aristotle's thesis concerning demonstration by reductio ad impossibile. I conclude by indicating how Aristotle's thesis is related to analogous results in contemporary theories of grounding.

"The New Atheism, Modern Science and Belief in God"Date: Friday, Nov. 2Time: 2:30 pm - 4:30 pmLocation: Tanner Humanitie...
10/26/2018

"The New Atheism, Modern Science and Belief in God"

Date: Friday, Nov. 2

Time: 2:30 pm - 4:30 pm

Location: Tanner Humanities Building (CTIHB), Room 101

https://www.facebook.com/events/259727661394198/

"New atheism" was a term coined by journalist, Gary Wolf, to describe a group of atheists (including Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and the late Christopher Hitchens) who were particularly vociferous in their attacks on religious belief, and Christian theism in particular. This lecture will offer some thoughts about this particular episode in conflict between science and religion, highlighting the work of a Christian theologian (Michael Buckley) and another atheist philosopher, Michael Ruse.

Address

Fourth Floor Of Carolyn Tanner Irish Humanities Building : 215 S Central Campus Dr
Salt Lake City, UT
84112

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when University of Utah Department of Philosophy posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The University

Send a message to University of Utah Department of Philosophy:

Share