https://www.facebook.com/160741080658021/

BlogHemphill

Directions

Blog on intellectual and purposeful think tank discussions from all sides of reasoned perspectives.

A Social Justice Commentary Concerning Law, Ethics, Culture, Religion, Theology and Politics.

10/31/2026

"LIES AND DAMN LIES: Economic Disaster and Artificial Constraints on a Capitalist Market Inflicted by Isolationism, Racial Nationalism and Corporate Corruption."

Craig Kyle Hemphill
2026

I.
Research Narrative Summary:

When a capitalist market is subjected to the combined forces of isolationism, racial nationalism, and corporate corruption, it experiences severe structural distortions that inevitably lead to economic stagnation or collapse. Far from being a free market, the economy becomes a highly controlled, inefficient system where political loyalty and identity supersede competence and consumer choice.

These three forces artificially constrain a capitalist economy and drive it toward disaster:

1. Isolationism
Strangling Trade and Innovation

Isolationism cuts an economy off from the global marketplace, severely limiting growth.

• Supply Chain Rupture: Modern manufacturing relies on complex, global supply chains. Forcing "total self-reliance" spikes production costs and causes severe shortages of critical components.

• Retaliatory Tariffs: Imposing trade barriers invites immediate retaliation from foreign partners, destroying export-heavy domestic industries (like agriculture or high-tech manufacturing).

• Capital Flight: Foreign and domestic investors withdraw their capital to place it in more stable, open, and predictable markets, leaving the domestic economy starved of investment.

2. Racial Nationalism: Distorting the Labor Market

Racial nationalism introduces non-economic criteria into business decisions, crippling productivity.

• Artificial Labor Shortages: Expelling foreign labor or restricting immigration starves essential sectors—such as agriculture, healthcare, construction, and technology—of both low-skilled and highly specialized workers.

• Brain Drain: The country's top intellectual and entrepreneurial talent flees persecution and social instability, permanently damaging the nation's innovation capacity.

• Inefficient Resource Allocation: Businesses are pressured or forced to hire, promote, or partner based on a reverse racial or ethnic identity rather than merit, skill, or economic efficiency--the opposite of diversity in talent, intellect and skills.

3. Corporate Corruption: The Rise of Crony Capitalism

When corporate corruption aligns with state ideology, true market competition dies, giving way to kleptocracy.

• Crony Monopolies: The state awards lucrative government contracts, subsidies, and regulatory exemptions exclusively to politically loyal corporate insiders, stifling small businesses and startups.

• Market Inefficiency: Because these "crony" corporations face no real market competition, they have no incentive to innovate, lower prices, or improve quality, leading to systemic economic stagnation.

• Erosion of the Rule of Law: Property rights become conditional on political obedience. If a business owner falls out of favor with the ruling regime, their assets can be arbitrarily seized or heavily taxed.

Historical & Structural Visual Overview Summary

Force Artificial Market Constraint Direct Economic Outcome and
Isolationism Destroys global trade networks and blocks foreign investment.

Hyperinflation, shortages, and dead export sectors.

Racial Nationalism Restricts labor mobility and prioritizes identity over merit. Severe brain drain, labor shortages, and cratered productivity.

Corporate Corruption Replaces free competition with backroom political favors. Systemic inefficiency, lack of innovation, and wealth hoarding.

The Cumulative Disaster

When these dynamics converge, they trigger a cascading crisis. The state like N**i Germany or the falsity of Crypto currency must print money to sustain inefficient crony monopolies and mask the loss of foreign trade revenue, fueling hyperinflation. Simultaneously, widespread shortages of basic goods emerge due to disrupted supply chains, tainted or inferior market goods, and a depleted workforce.

Ultimately, the market ceases to be "capitalist" in any functional sense; it transforms into a closed, fragile command economy managed by an elite few, culminating in a profound collapse of living standards.

• Historical case studies include 1930s autarkic regimes (N**i.Germany).

• Specific macroeconomic metrics such as GDP impact, currency depreciation, or bond yields and strongly signal economic decline.

• Modern multinational corporations should navigate or resist these types of political pressures.

II.
Research Practicum Examinations

1. Identify Key Thesis Concepts:

Economic isolationism, racial nationalism, and corporate corruption act as artificial constraints on a capitalist market, transforming it into a closed system that inevitably drives a society toward economic disaster. Free markets rely on the fluid movement of labor, capital, and goods, alongside transparent competition. When these three forces intersect, they choke off that fluidity and replace merit-based competition with identity-based cronyism.

2. Analytical Disection.

Examining of disecting how these elements disrupt market mechanics and trigger economic collapse:

A. Isolationism: Choking Supply and Innovation

Isolationism artificially forces an economy to become self-reliant by cutting off global trade, immigration, and foreign investment.

Supply Chain Fragility: Forcing domestic production of goods that are cheaper to import drives up prices, triggers severe inflation, and creates immediate scarcity.

Capital Starvation: Blocking foreign investment restricts the pool of available capital, causing domestic interest rates to spike and businesses to struggle to fund new ventures.

Brain Drain: Halting the global exchange of ideas and high-skilled labor causes domestic industries to stagnate, leaving them unable to compete globally.

B. Racial Nationalism: Fracturing the Labor Market

Racial nationalism imposes state-sanctioned discrimination, prioritizing demographic traits over economic utility and individual competence.

Labor Inefficiency: Excluding minority populations from specific industries creates artificial labor shortages. Highly skilled individuals are barred from roles where they could generate maximum economic value, depressing total GDP.

Market Fragmentation: The consumer base shrinks as marginalized groups are financially suppressed. Businesses lose entire demographics of buyers, reducing total demand.

Resource Misallocation: Capital is spent on enforcing segregation, border blockades, and discriminatory legal frameworks rather than being invested in public infrastructure, education, or technology--similar.examples include reverse class discrimination of Venezuela (poor v. rich)

C. Corporate Corruption: The Death of Competition

When corporate monopolies capture state regulatory power, capitalism devolves into cronyism. The market ceases to be free and becomes a tool for wealth extraction.

Regulatory Capture: Corrupt corporations use state power to pass laws that protect themselves from new competitors, effectively banning grassroots innovation.
Cartelization:

-Prices are set by corporate cartels rather than supply and demand. This strips consumers of purchasing power and reduces the real value of wages.

-The "Kleptocratic Loop": Public tax dollars are funneled directly into the pockets of politically connected corporations through rigged state contracts and bailouts, rapidly expanding national debt while starving the public sector.

3. Result/Conclusion Research Summary

A. The Anatomy of the Economic Disaster

When these three forces combine, they trigger a distinct economic death spiral:

a. Phase Market Shift Economic Consequence

Phase 1: Stagnation Capital flees the country; import costs surge due to isolationist tariffs. Immediate stagflation (high inflation coupled with flat lining economic growth).

Phase 2: Consolidation Corrupt corporate cartels ally with nationalist politicians to monopolize dwindling resources. Smuggling and black markets dominate as legitimate supply lines collapse.

Phase 3: Collapse Meritocracy is completely replaced by loyalty and identity. Systemic insolvency; the currency loses its value, and the state defaults on its debts.

B. Historical examples, such as the economic trajectory of interwar autarkies in Europe or the collapse of mid-20th-century regimes that paired strict nationalism with state-backed monopolies, demonstrate that a market cannot remain productive when it is artificially starved of global talent, dominated by corrupt elites, and fractured by social division.

10/21/2026

The Professor...

10/17/2026

"Quantum Physics, Singularity, Juxtaposition, Oneness and Combatting Racial Discrimination in the United States through State and Federal Litigation."
2026 (Title Copyright Only)
Craig K. Hemphill

Research Finding Positions and Academic Guidelines/Summaries

The intersection of Quantum Physics, the Singularity, Juxtaposition, and Oneness offers a unique philosophical and scientific framework to reimagine combatting racial discrimination in the United States through state and federal litigation.

By viewing civil rights litigation through the lens of these advanced concepts, lawyers and advocates can move past outdated legal paradigms and build more holistic, interconnected strategies for social justice.

1. Oneness & Quantum Physics: Challenging the "Separate" Legal Status

In traditional U.S. litigation, plaintiffs must prove individual harm caused by an individual actor. However, Quantum Physics and the concept of Oneness (quantum entanglement) prove that at a fundamental level, everything is deeply interconnected.

• The Quantum Reality: In entanglement, two particles remain connected across vast distances; what happens to one instantly affects the other.

• The Legal Application: This presuposition supports systemic litigation rather than isolated cases. Instead of viewing racial discrimination as isolated incidents by "bad apples," a quantum approach treats racism as a field-wide phenomenon. Litigation can target the interconnected institutional networks—combining housing, education, and banking discrimination into comprehensive, intersectional lawsuits.

2. Juxtaposition: Exposing the Constitutional Paradox

Juxtaposition is the act of placing two concepts side-by-side to highlight their contrasts. The entire history of U.S. civil rights litigation is built on a massive historical juxtaposition.

• The Constitutional Contradiction: Litigators constantly juxtapose the lofty ideals of the Fourteenth Amendment (Equal Protection) and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against the stark, lived realities of systemic racism.

• In the Courtroom: Effective litigation uses this contrast as a rhetorical and evidentiary tool. By placing analytical data that expose generational wealth gaps directly next to corporate diversity pledges, or mapping redlined districts next to modern environmental hazards, lawyers force federal and state courts to confront the gap between American ideals and American reality.

3. The Singularity: The Future Era of Civil Rights Evidence

In technological terms, the Singularity represents a theoretical future point where AI technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, fundamentally altering human civilization.

• The Data Explosion: As we approach a data and AI singularity, the tools available for civil rights litigation are shifting exponentially.

• Algorithmic Discrimination Litigation: Federal litigation is increasingly focusing on automated bias—such as AI algorithms used in hiring, predictive policing, and loan approvals. Litigators may use advanced data analytics to uncover hidden, systemic discrimination that human eyes could never detect, turning the tools of the tech revolution into mechanisms for accountability.

The Practical Battlefield: State vs. Federal Litigation

Because federal and state courts operate under different constitutional frameworks, advocates must strategically choose their legal battlegrounds:

--Legal Arena Core Focus & Strategy Quantum / Concept Alignment
Federal Litigation Focusing on the Fourteenth Amendment and federal statutes (Title VII, Title IX). Perfect for striking down broad, state-level discriminatory laws or tackling nationwide corporate biases.

The Singularity: Tackling nationwide tech, algorithmic bias, and systemic federal policy shifts.

--State Litigation Utilizing state constitutions, which often grant broader civil rights protections than the U.S. Constitution.

State litigatiin is essential for fighting local issues like school funding inequities and gerrymandering.

Oneness / Juxtaposition: Addressing localized, interconnected community harms and contrasting state ideals with local realities

Thus, bridging the cosmic and the legal, using the framework of quantum physics, singularity, juxtaposition, and oneness as conceptual lenses to dismantle racial discrimination through state and federal litigation is viable. Through translating theoretical physics and philosophy into actionable courtroom strategy, lawyers, plaintiffs and advocacy groups can expose the artificial nature of systemic racism and enforce constitutional protections.

Summary:

The Core Concepts Defined

• Quantum Physics: The study of matter and energy at the most fundamental level. Key principles like entanglement prove that particles can remain deeply connected across vast distances, meaning an action on one directly affects another.

• Singularity: A point where traditional laws of physics break down (like the center of a black hole) or where diverse elements converge into a single, infinitely potent inflection point.

• Juxtaposition: The act of placing two contrasting concepts side-by-side to highlight their differences, contradictions, or hidden relationships.

• Oneness: The philosophical and biological reality that all human beings share a foundational interconnectedness and a common origin.

The Framework: Translating Science into Civil Rights Litigation

1. Quantum Entanglement & The "Injury-in-Fact" Standard

In federal litigation, standing requires proving an "injury-in-fact" that is concrete and particularized. Systemic racism often operates insidiously, making macro-level harms difficult to trace to a single state action.

• The Quantum Strategy: Litigators can use the concept of quantum entanglement to challenge restrictive standing doctrines. By demonstrating that discriminatory state policies in one sector (e.g., redlining or gerrymandering) are "entangled" with harms in another (e.g., school underfunding or environmental injustice), lawyers can establish a chain of causation.

• Courtroom Application: Litigants may argue that harm to a specific subset of citizens inherently destabilizes and injures the broader community, fulfilling the Lujan standing requirements through interconnected economic and sociological data.

2. The Singularity as a Legal Inflection Point

In physics, a singularity disrupts the established order. In civil rights law, a legal singularity is a landmark case or statutory pivot point that shatters discriminatory precedents (or in recent legal precedents re-cements racism in legal rulings to antiquated US social positions--see recent US Supreme Court voting rights opinions in Super-far right electoral gerrymadering)

• The Singularity Strategy: Identify and exploit internal contradictions within bad legal precedents (like qualified presidential immunity or the high burden of proving discriminatory intent under the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause).

• Courtroom Application: Litigants push for a "singularity event" in state supreme courts. Because state constitutions can grant broader civil rights protections than the U.S. Constitution, litigators can use state-level Equal Rights Amendments to create new, progressive precedents that bypass a questionable partisian name-only conservative federal judiciary.

3. Juxtaposition of Constitutional Realities

Systemic discrimination thrives on a paradox: the law promises equality, but state mechanisms deliver disparate outcomes.

• The Juxtaposition Strategy: Force judges and juries to confront the stark contrast between de jure (legal) equality and de facto (actual) discrimination; or in recent events de jure discrimination.

• Courtroom Application: In Title VII (employment) or Title VI (federal funding) litigation, juxtapose a defendant's stated diversity policies directly against their statistical outcomes. Use data visualization to contrast a pristine corporate or municipal policy with a timeline of disparate impacts, proving that neutral-faced policies mask discriminatory motives.

4. Oneness as the Foundational Equal Protection Argument

The concept of oneness is not just a spiritual ideal; it is a genetic and constitutional fact. The human genome proves we are one species, and the 14th Amendment was written to ensure a singular standard of citizenship.

• The Oneness Strategy: Lawyers may tactically weaponize the concept of oneness to dismantle the pseudo-scientific or cultural biases that rely on "othering" minoritized groups.

• Courtroom Application: Similar to Justice Thurgood Marshall when he was a trial lawyer, litigants in civil rights litigation must use expert testimony from geneticists, sociologists, and historians to reinforce that race is a socially constructed fiction with devastatingly real legal consequences. Frame anti-discrimination laws not as a request for "special treatment," but as a strict enforcement of the universal oneness guaranteed by the phrase "Equal Protection of the Laws."

Strategic Conclusions: State vs. Federal Jurisdictions

Conceptual Lens Legal Target Federal Forum (U.S. Courts) State Forum (State Courts)

--Quantum Entanglement/ Systemic Causation
Establish standing in environmental and economic justice cases: Challenge systemic school funding inequities across district lines.

--Singularity
Overturning Precedent:
Chip away at qualified immunity (42 U.S.C. § 1983) by presenting egregious, novel fact patterns.
Establish broader civil rights protections under state constitutional torts.

--Juxtaposition Evidentiary Proof Use Disparate Impact analysis to contrast intent vs. statistical outcome.

10/12/2026

CKH Legal
Corporate and Litigation Lawyers

10/06/2026

Coasean Economic Theory, Racism and Legal Solutions/Critique

Applying Ronald Coase’s economic framework—specifically the Coase Theorem—to systemic racism and market inequality involves treating discrimination as a negative externality or a problem of conflicting property rights.

In Coasean theory, if property rights are well-defined and transaction costs are zero, bargaining will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of rights. However, applying this to racial inequality reveals profound systemic friction, making it a heavily critiqued approach.

The Coasean Framework for Combating Racism

To apply Coase to racial discrimination, the legal system must first explicitly define the "rights" in question and attempt to reduce the friction of resolving disputes.

Defining Legal Property Rights
The Right to Discriminate vs. The Right to Be Free from Discrimination:

The law must establish who holds the entitlement. Civil rights legislation (like the Civil Rights Act) essentially grants minorities the "property right" to equal treatment in employment, housing, and public accommodations.

Internalizing the Cost: If a business wishes to discriminate, it must "buy out" the victim’s right to equal treatment, forcing the discriminator to internalize the psychological and economic costs of their prejudice.

Lowering Transaction Costs

Class Action Frameworks: An individual facing systemic housing discrimination faces massive transaction costs (legal fees, time, proof) to bargain or sue. Legal solutions that aggregate these claims—such as class-action lawsuits or government enforcement agencies (like the EEOC)—drastically lower transaction costs, making market corrections possible.

Standardized Legal Remediation
Damages as Pricing Signals: Coasean legal solutions favor clear, predictable damages over complex injunctions. By setting high statutory damages for discriminatory practices, the law alters the cost-benefit analysis of prejudiced market actors, making discrimination economically non-viable.

Optimum Critiques of the Coasean Approach

Legal and economic scholars offer severe critiques of using a pure Coasean approach to solve structural racism, as the theory’s foundational assumptions break down when applied to human rights.

Critiques and reality points include:
Coasean Unrealistic Assumptions versus Lived Experiences:
1. Reality in Racist/Unequal Markets that is the friction that wealth effects are neutral versus the reality that severe initial wealth disparities dictate who can bargain. 2. Transaction costs can be standardize versus structural barriers (redlining, bias) create infinite barriers.
3. Everything has a market price versus dignity, safety, and civil rights cannot be monetized.
4. The prohibitive reality of tansaction costs--Coase assumes bargaining is feasible. In reality, systemic racism creates impenetrable transaction costs.

Information Asymmetry or ignorance inequalities--victims often do not know they are being discriminated against (e.g., algorithmic bias in hiring or AI lending).

Critiques/Friction:

The legal hurdles required to prove intent or disparate impact are so high that they prevent efficient bargaining or settlement from ever occurring.

The Wealth Effect Distortion (Initial Allocation Matters)
The Coase Theorem states that resource allocation will be efficient regardless of who gets the initial right. Critics point out this ignores the wealth effect.

Because historical racism has concentrated capital in the hands of the dominant group, perpetrators of discrimination possess far more market power to "buy the right to discriminate" or sustain legal battles.

If a minority group lacks the capital to outbid or legally challenge a wealthy discriminator, the market "efficiently" perpetuates segregation and inequality.

Incommensurability (The Pricing Failure)
Coasean theory treats discrimination like pollution—a cost to be managed and priced. Yet, civil rights, human dignity, and freedom from systemic oppression are incommensurable (they cannot be valued in dollars).
Allowing market actors to simply pay a "tax" or a fine to continue discriminatory practices transforms a fundamental human right into a commodity, failing to eliminate the moral harm. A democratic failure if you will.

Endogenous Preferences:

Coase treats market preferences as fixed. However, racism is a dynamic, socially constructed preference. A legal framework that merely prices discrimination accepts racism as a permanent market desire, rather than using the law expressively to reshape societal values and eliminate prejudice entirely. While it is true hearts cannot be regulated, moral and ethical lights are always the high-order of the day!

10/06/2026

QUANTUM PHYSICS, LAW AND ECONOMICS

The intersection of quantum physics, law, and economics is an emerging intellectual framework that applies the principles of quantum mechanics—such as superposition, entanglement, and observer effects—to explain how legal systems and markets operate. Rather than treating human behavior like a predictable machine (as classical economics does), a quantum approach views legal and economic systems as dynamic, uncertain, and deeply interconnected fields.
Here is how the core concepts of quantum physics translate into law and economics:

Quantum Superposition:

The Ambiguity of Law and Value
In Physics: A particle exists in multiple potential states or locations at the same time until it is measured.

In Law: A legal statute, contract clause, or constitutional right exists in a state of superposition before a judge rules on it. It simultaneously holds multiple potential meanings. For example, before a landmark verdict (like Brown v. Board of Education), the law represents a cloud of possibilities; the judicial ruling acts as the "measurement" that collapses those possibilities into a single legal reality.

In Economics: Value is not inherent or fixed. An asset or a company's stock exists in a superposition of potential values based on market sentiment. The actual price only crystallizes at the exact moment a transaction occurs.

Quantum Entanglement:

Systemic Interconnectedness
In Physics: Two entangled particles remain connected across vast distances; changing the state of one instantly changes the state of the other.

In Law & Economics: Markets and legal rules are deeply entangled. You cannot alter a financial regulation in one sector without instantly triggering downstream behavioral changes in completely different markets.

Socioeconomic Impacts: This framework is often used to analyze complex legal-economic realities like race, systemic wealth gaps, and profit maximization. Traditional economics treats individuals as isolated, independent actors. Quantum economics argues that individuals are "entangled" within social structures, historical contexts, and institutional biases. A policy change targeting corporate profit models will inherently and instantly ripple through labor markets and community equities due to this structural entanglement.

The Observer Effect:

Measurement Alters Reality
In Physics: The act of observing or measuring a quantum system changes the behavior of the particles being watched.

In Law: The introduction of a legal audit, regulatory oversight, or a new law changes how people behave simply because they know they are being monitored.

In Economics: Financial markets react immediately to the anticipation of data collection or policy shifts. For example, if the Federal Reserve announces it is studying inflation metrics, the market alters its behavior before any actual policy is implemented. The "observer" (the regulator) changes the "system" (the market) merely by watching it.

Classical vs. Quantum Legal-Economic Models
Concept Classical Model (Newtonian) Quantum Model
Human Behavior Rational, predictable, and fully independent. Interconnected, contextual, and fluctuating.

Market State Tends toward a static equilibrium. Exists in a continuous wave of probabilities.

Legal Interpretation The law is a fixed rule waiting to be applied. The law is a potentiality shaped by the act of adjudication.

System View Mechanistic (inputs perfectly equal outputs). Organic and complex (small changes cause massive shifts).

By shifting from a rigid, mechanical view to a quantum framework, scholars can better model real-world complexities—such as market crashes, sudden shifts in judicial philosophy, and the deeply entangled nature of profit, policy, and social equity.

10/06/2026

Craig Kyle Hemphil—Managing Legal Counsel at CKH Legal and corporate attorney with a background in economics—has published several short analytical articles and legal commentaries examining the intersection of business, law, and economic principles.

His writing integrates microeconomic optimization models with contemporary corporate governance and civil discourse.

Key Economic Analysis Articles & Commentaries:

"Economic Integrity Deadpans Culture Wars" (2026)
Core Argument: Evaluates how artificial market constraints and non-economic motivations (such as corporate corruption or systemic racism) act as negative externalities that disrupt pure capitalist models.
Framework: Utilizing microeconomic principles, Hemphill models how market optimization relies heavily on comprehensive product knowledge and diverse resource outlays (e.g., a diverse workforce) to drive long-term profit stability and wage growth. He characterizes non-market-driven interference as "negative game theory".

"Private Equity/Investment Operation Funders and Law Firm Business Consultant Models: Traps and Rewards" (2026)
Core Argument: Examines the financial and regulatory implications of outside investment firms taking equity stakes in law firm business operations.

Framework: Written from his dual perspective as a lawyer and economist, the paper contrasts the operational benefits of private equity injections with the legal "landmines" of fee-sharing and non-lawyer influence on client matters. Hemphill proposes a structural division separating investment-backed business consulting arms from traditional legal advocacy to safeguard ethical compliance.

"Strategic Alliances: Considering Client Representation as Growth Models" (2024)

Core Argument: Explores law firm geographic expansion and business scaling through a strict economic lens.

Framework: Analyzes how firms should model expansion based on localized economic incentives rather than speculative growth, advocating for broad-based client engagement structures that naturally compound related business opportunities within a specific market.

Research and Academic Background
Hemphill’s writing is heavily informed by his academic focus on Law and Economics. He holds a B.S. in Economics from the University of Texas at Arlington and has taught as a business law professor in the University of Houston System, focusing on business ethics, management, and labor relations.

07/31/2026

"Synergy: Dollars $ Sense." Craig K. Hemphill Copyright 2026 When I was a newly minted JFK half-silver dollar lawyer way back when, I wanted to have the first of EVERYTHING--first black partner at the BIG LAW firm I practiced with, first office in Dallas, Texas, for that same firm--Greatest black co...

07/21/2026

"Economic Integrity Deadpans Culture Wars"
Craig K. Hemphill
© 2026

In a capitalist market model, economy choices in goods and capital/human labor are free to be chosen by suppliers and consumers. Goods and resources will either be superior or inferior.

Yet, when irrational motives caused by consumer or supplier deflation of product or resource knowledge leads to externalities in market principles (e.g., racism or corporate corruption), longterm market optimization suffers.

Economic integrity in product knowledge and resource outlays require informed decisions absent market floors or artificial constraints. These capital market truths apply to culture wars. Culture wars are rot to economic prosperity. Government or private industry stakeholders that infuse market inefficient principles into a capitalist system are perfectly inelastic and bad for market growth and market performance.

Economic models of market optimization demonstrates vast choices in products and resource outlays (i.e., a diverse workforce) lead to market stability and increased profits as well as potential wage gains. It is simple macro economics driven by solid micro economic principles.

Everything else is market smokescreens and mirrors and offer capitalist market disdain. Economics describe this situation as negative game theory.

Address

Houston, TX
77002

Website

facebook.com

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when BlogHemphill posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.